Dead? November 3, 2014Posted by JP in Discussion.
add a comment
When you are dead, you don’t know that you are dead. It is difficult only for the others.
It is the same when you are stupid.
Them’s the jokes folks! November 1, 2014Posted by JP in Discussion.
add a comment
Once I saw this guy on a bridge about to jump. I said, “Don’t do it!”
He said, “Nobody loves me.”
I said, “God loves you. Do you believe in God?”
He said, “Yes.” I said, “Are you a Christian or a Jew?”
He said, “A Christian.” I said, “Me too! Protestant or Catholic?”
He said, “Protestant.” I said, “Me too! What franchise?”
He said, “Baptist.” I said, “Me too! Northern Baptist or Southern Baptist?”
He said, “Northern Baptist.” I said, “Me too! Northern Conservative Baptist or Northern Liberal Baptist?”
He said, “Northern Conservative Baptist.” I said, “Me too! Northern Conservative Baptist Great Lakes Region or Northern Conservative Baptist Eastern Region?”
He said, “Northern Conservative Baptist Great Lakes Region.” I said, “Me too! Northern Conservative Baptist Great Lakes Region Council of 1879 or Northern Conservative Baptist Great Lakes Region Council of 1912?”
He said, “Northern Conservative Baptist Great Lakes Region Council of 1912.” I said, “Die, heretic!” And I pushed him over.
A Roman walks into a bar and asks for a martinus. “You mean a martini?” the bartender asks. The Roman replies, “If I wanted a double, I would have asked for it!”
Another Roman walks into the bar, holds up two fingers, and says, “Five beers, please.”
A Time For Choosing October 29, 2014Posted by JP in Discussion, Politics, Uncategorized.
add a comment
50 years ago, on October 27, 1964, Ronald Reagan gave this speech in support of Presidential candidate Barry Goldwater. As I listened to it today I was amazed at how prophetic Mr. Reagan’s remarks were.
50 years ago he spoke of things which are seemingly coming to fruition today. He spoke of the war against communism which now can be identified as the war against Islamic extremism:
As for the peace that we would preserve, I wonder who among us would like to approach the wife or mother whose husband or son has died in South Vietnam and ask them if they think this is a peace that should be maintained indefinitely. Do they mean peace, or do they mean we just want to be left in peace? There can be no real peace while one American is dying some place in the world for the rest of us. We’re at war with the most dangerous enemy that has ever faced mankind in his long climb from the swamp to the stars, and it’s been said if we lose that war, and in so doing lose this way of freedom of ours, history will record with the greatest astonishment that those who had the most to lose did the least to prevent its happening. Well I think it’s time we ask ourselves if we still know the freedoms that were intended for us by the Founding Fathers.
Not too long ago, two friends of mine were talking to a Cuban refugee, a businessman who had escaped from Castro, and in the midst of his story one of my friends turned to the other and said, “We don’t know how lucky we are.” And the Cuban stopped and said, “How lucky you are? I had someplace to escape to.” And in that sentence he told us the entire story. If we lose freedom here, there’s no place to escape to. This is the last stand on earth.
He spoke of individual freedom at length and his words echo as if he were speaking of events of this day and the government’s continuing role in controlling our lives and liberties:
This is the issue of this election: Whether we believe in our capacity for self-government or whether we abandon the American revolution and confess that a little intellectual elite in a far-distant capitol can plan our lives for us better than we can plan them ourselves.
You and I are told increasingly we have to choose between a left or right. Well I’d like to suggest there is no such thing as a left or right. There’s only an up or down—[up] man’s old—old-aged dream, the ultimate in individual freedom consistent with law and order, or down to the ant heap of totalitarianism. And regardless of their sincerity, their humanitarian motives, those who would trade our freedom for security have embarked on this downward course.
In this vote-harvesting time, they use terms like the “Great Society,” or as we were told a few days ago by the President, we must accept a greater government activity in the affairs of the people. But they’ve been a little more explicit in the past and among themselves; and all of the things I now will quote have appeared in print. These are not Republican accusations. For example, they have voices that say, “The cold war will end through our acceptance of a not undemocratic socialism.” Another voice says, “The profit motive has become outmoded. It must be replaced by the incentives of the welfare state.” Or, “Our traditional system of individual freedom is incapable of solving the complex problems of the 20th century.” Senator Fullbright has said atStanford University that the Constitution is outmoded. He referred to the President as “our moral teacher and our leader,” and he says he is “hobbled in his task by the restrictions of power imposed on him by this antiquated document.” He must “be freed,” so that he “can do for us” what he knows “is best.” And Senator Clark of Pennsylvania, another articulate spokesman, defines liberalism as “meeting the material needs of the masses through the full power of centralized government.”
Well, I, for one, resent it when a representative of the people refers to you and me, the free men and women of this country, as “the masses.” This is a term we haven’t applied to ourselves inAmerica. But beyond that, “the full power of centralized government”—this was the very thing the Founding Fathers sought to minimize. They knew that governments don’t control things. A government can’t control the economy without controlling people. And they know when a government sets out to do that, it must use force and coercion to achieve its purpose. They also knew, those Founding Fathers, that outside of its legitimate functions, government does nothing as well or as economically as the private sector of the economy.
He spoke of the welfare state and the government’s inability to ‘fix’ the problems of the poor
We have so many people who can’t see a fat man standing beside a thin one without coming to the conclusion the fat man got that way by taking advantage of the thin one. So they’re going to solve all the problems of human misery through government and government planning. Well, now, if government planning and welfare had the answer—and they’ve had almost 30 years of it—shouldn’t we expect government to read the score to us once in a while? Shouldn’t they be telling us about the decline each year in the number of people needing help? The reduction in the need for public housing?
But the reverse is true. Each year the need grows greater; the program grows greater. We were told four years ago that 17 million people went to bed hungry each night. Well that was probably true. They were all on a diet. But now we’re told that 9.3 million families in this country are poverty-stricken on the basis of earning less than 3,000 dollars a year. Welfare spending [is] 10 times greater than in the dark depths of the Depression. We’re spending 45 billion dollars on welfare. Now do a little arithmetic, and you’ll find that if we divided the 45 billion dollars up equally among those 9 million poor families, we’d be able to give each family 4,600 dollars a year. And this added to their present income should eliminate poverty. Direct aid to the poor, however, is only running only about 600 dollars per family. It would seem that someplace there must be some overhead.
He spoke of the Democratic party and its slide into socialism, a slide which has never been so apparent as it is now:
back in 1936, Mr. Democrat himself, Al Smith, the great American, came before the American people and charged that the leadership of his Party was taking the Party of Jefferson, Jackson, and Cleveland down the road under the banners of Marx, Lenin, and Stalin. And he walked away from his Party, and he never returned til the day he died—because to this day, the leadership of that Party has been taking that Party, that honorable Party, down the road in the image of the labor Socialist Party of England.
Now it doesn’t require expropriation or confiscation of private property or business to impose socialism on a people. What does it mean whether you hold the deed to the—or the title to your business or property if the government holds the power of life and death over that business or property? And such machinery already exists. The government can find some charge to bring against any concern it chooses to prosecute. Every businessman has his own tale of harassment. Somewhere a perversion has taken place. Our natural, unalienable rights are now considered to be a dispensation of government, and freedom has never been so fragile, so close to slipping from our grasp as it is at this moment.
In one week we go to the polls to vote on the next round of people to help lead our nation forward; either forward to greatness based on the principles established by our Founding Fathers, or forward into socialism and the horror of George Orwell’s “1984:
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face—for ever.
The Party seeks power entirely for its own sake. We are not interested in the good of others; we are interested solely in power, pure power.
You can read Mr. Reagan’s entire speech here: http://www.reagan.utexas.edu/archives/reference/timechoosing.html
Or watch it
The First Amendment being spit upon… October 21, 2014Posted by JP in Discussion, Politics, Venting.
add a comment
The United States of America is supposedly a nation governed by laws which, in theory, comply with the dictates of the United States Constitution. You may recall this document from your history classes as the establishing standard of government and law in the USA. It establishes the construct of our government, the rights of our people and the restrictions to law and governance as it pertains to the actions of our government.
It appears however, that various governments, Federal and State, seem to forget about the allowances and restrictions put forth in the Constitution when it comes to the pursuit of personal or political agendas.
Regarding this disdain for the dictates of our Nation’s founding document I could write about our President’s misuse of the Executive Order – which has no constitutional provision or statute explicitly permitting them – but what I really want to touch briefly on the First Amendment to the Constitution, part of what is known as “The Bill of Rights”, and the societal trend to use the unconstitutional phrase “separation of church and state” as a club to beat down religion, or in cases such as which I am now discussing; to completely ignore this Amendment in order to repress, intimidate, and control citizens exercising their freedom of religion.
Think about this:
The text of the First Amendment reads:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
This Amendment – this right – guarantees the citizens of this nation two sides of the same coin. In common terms we have the freedom of religion, and the freedom from religion.
The atheist activists in this country have long pushed the ‘freedom from religion’ argument as the governing concept of the first amendment and for the most part the judicial arms of this country have embraced that agenda and have passed laws enforcing that concept. However, what the spirit of the amendment really embraces is the opposite idea. We have the freedom OF religion. We have the freedom to exercise our religions without the influence of the government, or the restrictions of the state.
Two news stories have caught my attention being the impetus for this writing.
“The Knapps are in fear that if they exercise their First Amendment rights they will be cited, prosecuted and sent to jail.”
- Alliance Defending Freedom attorney, Jeremy Tedesco
The Constitution of the United States of America guarantees all its citizens the right to exercise their religion without interference of the governments of this nation. Thomas Jefferson coined the often misused concept of ‘separation of church and state’ in an 1802 letter to Danbury Baptists in which he wrote:
Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between Man & his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legitimate powers of government reach actions only, & not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should “make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,” thus building a wall of separation between Church & State. Adhering to this expression of the supreme will of the nation in behalf of the rights of conscience, I shall see with sincere satisfaction the progress of those sentiments which tend to restore to man all his natural rights, convinced he has no natural right in opposition to his social duties
It is time for us, as ministers of the Gospel, to stand against the flawed idea that the First Amendment guarantees only the right of freedom from religion and to promote the idea that we have the right, by law, to exercise our freedom OF religion.
The Seven-Fold Purpose of God’s Word June 24, 2014Posted by JP in Discussion.
add a comment
Originally posted on JP's Mind:
The Word of God, energized by the Holy Spirit, has a seven-fold purpose in our lives:
Psa 119:105 Your word is a lamp to my feet and a light to my path
Psa 119:130 The entrance and unfolding of Your words give light; their unfolding gives understanding (discernment and comprehension) to the simple.
Under the illumination of God’s Word, we see ourselves in the light of God’s holiness. The Bible sheds light on behavior and actions that displease the Lord and lights up the path that God has designated for you to walk.
John 16:7-11 However, I am telling you nothing but the truth when I say it is profitable (good, expedient, advantageous) for you that I go away. Because if I do not go away, the Comforter (Counselor, Helper, Advocate, Intercessor, Strengthener, Standby) will not come to you [into close fellowship with you]; but if I…
View original 2,384 more words
Father’s Day June 15, 2014Posted by JP in Poetry.
add a comment
building the crib,
painting the room,
dealing with your pregnant mom,
8 months along, in August.
Days and nights,
with you on my mind,
measles, chicken pox,
(you shared those with me, didn’t you?)
mumps and flu as well.
Taking off work,
to see you sing,
school plays, recitals,
Weekends spent traveling
vacations, softball tournaments.
Working two jobs,
to give you the house,
the clothes you need,
food to eat,
and a bit of cash for your pocket.
Late nights spent,
waiting for you,
driving the streets
trying to find you
because you did not call.
All the pain, work
love and joy
run through my mind
on this day, my day.
All I have done for you,
all I have endured for you,
I’ve done for my soul,
for my heart, out of love.
On this day, this day set aside
for sons and daughters
to show their love for fathers
you show your love to me,
with a tie.
Sola x5 March 19, 2014Posted by JP in Bible Study, Discussion, Faith, Scripture.
Sola Scriputura – Scripture alone.
Authority for teaching and the message of salvation are found in the Scriptures alone. It is the teaching of Scripture that the Scripture is sufficient for all spiritual matters (cf. 2 Pet. 1:2). The Scriptures alone are sufficient for salvation, sanctification and proclamation (2 Timothy 3:14-4:5).
Too many appeal to experience, extra-biblical revelations, mysticism, pragmatism, tradition or philosophy in-order to claim and know spiritual truth is an evident attack against the truth of Sola Scriptura. Many seem to embrace many of the above categories before consulting the Scriptures or even embrace them above and in place of the Scriptures. Such trends sweep through the church and distort the biblical doctrine of the sufficiency of Scripture. If we are going to know the truth about salvation and know the necessary spiritual truth for godliness we must know and protect this affirmation.
Sola Gratia – Grace alone.
Despite the effort of many people who try to obtain or maintain salvation by means of works, the words Sola Gratia destroy such a belief. They affirm that the only basis of salvation is the grace of God. The Scriptures are clear on this matter, “For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God” (Eph. 2:8). If one is to have a right standing with God, it cannot be achieved or inherited. Instead, it must be given by grace (cf.Rom. 3:24). Justification or the righteousness of God is a gracious gift given by God and there is no basis, ground or merits in ourselves that makes us deserving of justification. What is grace? The term “grace” refers to God’s favor towards those who do not deserve it.
Sola Fide – Faith alone
Saving faith does not trust in or rely on one’s own achievements; instead, the object of trust and reliance is the Lord Jesus Christ. Genuine saving faith is the recognition that we have nothing to offer God in-order to be forgiven of our sin and be saved. Faith is God’s appointed means in-order for us to receive salvation. Therefore, faith is coming to God on the grounds of grace – having nothing to offer – and trusting and adhering to Christ as Lord. Saving faith is a gift from God (cf. Phil. 1:29 and 2 Pet. 1:1), and with this gift we cling to His Son.
Sola Christus – Christ alone
Faith must be placed in Christ alone for salvation. Without faith “toward the Lord Jesus” (Philemon 5) there is no hope of salvation because He alone is “the way, the truth and the life” (John 14:6). There is only one saving and sure object of salvation, and that is the Lord Jesus Christ – “there is salvation in no one else, for there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved” (Acts 4:12).
Soli Deo Gloria – To God alone be the glory
At the end of Romans chapter 11, Paul proclaimed, “For from him and through him and to him are all things. To him be glory forever. Amen” (Rom. 11:36). In this verse God is seen as the source (“from Him“), sustainer (“through Him“) and goal (“to Him“) of “all things“. This is why He deserves all the glory. This is the recognition of those in Heaven, “Worthy are you, our Lord and God, to receive glory and honor and power, for you created all things, and by your will they existed and were created” (Rev. 4:11). Our response to this ought to be as follows, “So, whether you eat or drink, or whatever you do, do all to the glory of God” (1 Cor. 10:31). All social activities, work activities, play, Bible study, relationships, eating, talking – every activity we participate in is to be done to the glory of God. The Westminster Shorter Catechism opens with the question, “What is the chief end of man?” and it answers by saying, “Man’s chief end is to glorify God, and to enjoy him forever.”
Passions? March 5, 2014Posted by JP in Stupidity, Uncategorized, Venting.
I’ve been hearing a lot about passions lately. Lots of advice from successful people, career counselors, etc.:
Find your passion in life and do it if you want to be happy. If you hate your job, follow your passions. passion passion passion….
What do you do with your life if you don’t know what your passionate about? I mean really? I do a job and do it fairly well, but I’m not passionate about it. I like to garden and do fairly well at it, but halfway through the season I grow tired of watering, weeding, harvesting, etc. and want nothing more to do with it. I used to write poetry and was relatively good at it, but haven’t been able to write a thing in years and have had no desire to try either. I like to write here, share parts of my mind, but find it often times difficult to even think of something to say…
I would absolutely love to find something in this life that I enjoy above all things, something that I am passionate about, if only to give me an idea of what ‘passion’ really is, what it really means, and maybe something to do with my remaining years that will cause me to wake up in the morning with great expectations instead of resignation of another day of the same ol’ thing.
I deserve it! February 12, 2014Posted by JP in Bible Study, Discussion, Scripture.
add a comment
The world today (TV shows, Movies, Commercials, print advertisements, etc.) pushes the idea that we deserve things – We work hard and do the right thing so we deserve to have a comfortable life, a nice car, nice home, vacations, good salaries, etc.
Our instincts tell us that we deserve respect for who we are (parents, bosses, and citizens) and that we deserve fairness, justice, equality, love because we offer those things to others.
In essence we have been convinced, through up-bringing, through media, and through the fabric of our society that we deserve our due – we’ve worked for it, we’ve earned it, it is owed to us and it is our right to have it: we deserve it.
I want to discuss the spiritual/biblical concept of what we deserve, and how that leads into the worldly/carnal consequences of demanding our due.
According to Scripture, we have all sinned (Rom 3:10-12, Rom 3:23) and as a result of that sin, we all deserve death (Rom 6:23) and eternal judgment in the lake of fire (Rev 20:12-15). If God gave us all what we deserve, we would all be condemned for eternity. That we live at all is owed to God’s forbearance – an act of God’s mercy.
Not only are we undeserving recipients of God’s mercy, we are also recipients of His grace. We deserve nothing from God. God does not owe us anything. Anything good that we experience is a result of the grace of God (Eph 2:5 Even when we were dead (slain) by [our own] shortcomings and trespasses, He made us alive together in fellowship and in union with Christ; [He gave us the very life of Christ Himself, the same new life with which He quickened Him, for] it is by grace (His favor and mercy which you did not deserve) that you are saved (delivered from judgment and made partakers of Christ’s salvation).
Grace is simply defined as unmerited favor. God favors, or gives us good things that we do not deserve and could never earn. Rescued from judgment by God’s mercy, grace is anything and everything we receive beyond that mercy (Rom 3:24).
In Mark, chapter 10 James and John thought to ask Jesus for their ‘due’, for what they felt they deserved: And James and John, the sons of Zebedee, approached Him and said to Him, Teacher, we desire You to do for us whatever we ask of You. And He replied to them, what do you desire Me to do for you? And they said to Him, Grant that we may sit, one at Your right hand and one at [Your] left hand, in Your glory (Your majesty and splendor).
Jesus’ answer to them was that their due was to live a life of service, a life of giving – not receiving: But Jesus called them to [Him] and said to them, You know that those who are recognized as governing and are supposed to rule the Gentiles (the nations) lord it over them [ruling with absolute power, holding them in subjection], and their great men exercise authority and dominion over them. But this is not to be so among you; instead, whoever desires to be great among you must be your servant, And whoever wishes to be most important and first in rank among you must be slave of all. For even the Son of Man came not to have service rendered to Him, but to serve, and to give His life as a ransom for (instead of) many.
For the Christian, in the real world, our scriptural direction is to live a life as a servant to all. To give in all that we do and to understand that when we serve, when we give, it is not a means to an end or an act performed to get something back. We do not serve to be recompensed. We do not give to be compensated, intrinsically or extrinsically.
When we offer respect to an individual we do not (should not) show that respect in expectation that we will in turn be respected. We do not offer compassion with the goal of having that compassion returned. We do not give with the expectation that we will receive – what should underlie all of our service (in any form: respecting, loving, giving, and offering compassion, mercy, and forgiveness) is the knowledge that we do so because God has done so for us, without expectation that such would be returned.
It is fitting, at this point, to examine the true meaning of the word deserve. Webster defines it as such:
verb (used with object), de·served, de·serv·ing.
to merit, be qualified for, or have a claim to (reward, assistance, punishment, etc.)
because of actions, qualities, or situation.
verb (used without object), de·served, de·serv·ing.
to be worthy of, qualified for, or have a claim to reward,
punishment, recompense, etc.
If you look closely at how the word is constructed you see it as de – served, or de – serving. What does the prefix de- mean?
A prefix occurring in loanwords from Latin;
also used to indicate privation, removal, negation, reversal
In essence deserve is a negation of ‘serve’, a separation from ‘service’. It is essentially a diametric opposition to Christ’s example and dictate to serve.
From a psychological viewpoint we need to understand what expectation does to us. If we believe that we are owed something (“I’m the boss and I deserve their respect”, or “I’ve worked hard for this and I deserve it”) we are setting ourselves up for a whole plethora of negative thoughts and feelings when our expectations are not met. We become disappointed, we build resentment, anger, and envy.
Resentment can be sparked by perceived unfair treatment by another person. It could be an injustice, like not getting a deserved promotion, or it could be an insult. Either way, resentment stems from a love of the things of the world and a lack of faith in God and His plan. It is legitimate to recognize unfair treatment, and even to do something about it. But it is not helpful to wallow in feelings of self-righteous anger. The Bible is not concerned with the honor of human pride. An intense emotional response to an otherwise harmless insult may show a lack of spiritual maturity and a love of self – You have heard that it was said, An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth. But I say to you, Do not resist the evil man [who injures you]; but if anyone strikes you on the right jaw or cheek, turn to him the other one too. (Mat 5:38-39)
As David fled Jerusalem, he faced the curses and insults of Shimei. Rather than respond with resentment towards Shimei—and instead of killing him, as was the king’s right (verse 9)—David chose the path of humility. His words are amazing: “If he is cursing because the LORD said to him, ‘Curse David,’ who can ask, ‘Why do you do this?’”. David avoided feelings of resentment by viewing the situation as from the Lord.
Anger can become sinful when it is motivated by pride (James 1:20), when it is unproductive and thus distorts God’s purposes (1 Cor 10:31), or when anger is allowed to linger (Eph 4:26-27). One obvious sign that anger has turned to sin is when, instead of attacking the problem at hand, we attack the wrongdoer. Ephesians 4:15 says we are to speak the truth in love and use our words to build others up, not allow rotten or destructive words to pour from our lips. Unfortunately, this poisonous speech is a common characteristic of fallen man (Rom 6:13-14).
Anger becomes sin when it is allowed to boil over without restraint, resulting in a scenario in which hurt is multiplied (Prov 29:11), leaving devastation in its wake. Often, the consequences of out-of-control anger are irreparable. Anger also becomes sin when the angry one refuses to be pacified, holds a grudge, or keeps it all inside. This can cause depression and irritability over little things, which are often unrelated to the underlying problem.
But if you have bitter jealousy (envy) and contention (rivalry, selfish ambition) in your hearts, do not pride yourselves on it and thus be in defiance of and false to the Truth. This [superficial] wisdom is not such as comes down from above, but is earthly, unspiritual (animal), even devilish (demoniacal). For wherever there is jealousy (envy) and contention (rivalry and selfish ambition), there will also be confusion (unrest, disharmony, rebellion) and all sorts of evil and vile practices.
When we crave what someone else has rather than being grateful for what God has given, we hurt ourselves. Instead of envying others, we are called to love them.
True love—God’s love—rejoices when others are blessed. There is no room for envy. Love does not seek to benefit itself and it is content with what it has, because its focus is on meeting the needs of the loved one.